Times have changed
A VERY important precedent was created even before the London Beth Din convened to hear the dispute between Rabbi Moshe Gutnick and Mizrachi Synagogue. It occurred when the secular courts ruled that a rabbinic contract matter should go to religious arbitration.
YOSSI ARON
A VERY important precedent was created even before the London Beth Din convened to hear the dispute between Rabbi Moshe Gutnick and Mizrachi Synagogue. It occurred when the secular courts ruled that a rabbinic contract matter should go to religious arbitration.
Rabbinic contracts are subject to both halacha and secular law. Note however, that in many contractual instances the Shulchan Aruch refers to minhag hamakom — the custom of the place, which means that locally applicable secular laws can often be applied within halachic frameworks.
The lesson from this dispute is that both parties to any potential rabbinical employment contract need to seek the appropriate advice before entering into any agreement. It may indeed be that just as rabbis are starting to insist on mandatory prenuptial agreements before officiating at a wedding, they themselves may need to sign a similar agreement before taking over a congregation, with clear-cut severance guidelines.
Also relevant, however, is that the role of a rabbi has changed irrevocably. Older appointments of a “Rov” were as posek and teacher and appointments were made largely on reputation. While this may still be the case in some very Orthodox settings, there is a different situation in most contemporary mainstream congregations.
Today, rabbinic job descriptions include pastoral, functionary, counselling and a host of other ceremonial roles. The question arising therefore is: Even from a purely halachic perspective does the role of a rabbi today equate to that of the Rov of old to the extent that employment arrangements remain the same?
Are the lifetime arrangements involving the chazakah concept — of the continuing right to a position — still really relevant in regard to these very different positions?
One thing is certain. A more professional approach to all rabbinic contractual arrangements with consideration given to all contingencies is now essential for all parties to such matters.
comments