Beware a Bibi right/far-right coalition
search
Opinion

Beware a Bibi right/far-right coalition

Much is at stake in Israel and beyond. As we approach next week's election, once again personality dominates the campaign. And once again it is all about Bibi.

Opposition Leader Benjamin Netanyahu speaking in Tel Aviv on October 19. Photo: Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90
Opposition Leader Benjamin Netanyahu speaking in Tel Aviv on October 19. Photo: Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90

There are two schools of thought in our community when it comes to Israel. One is we must support Israel, warts and all. The other is that it is important to speak up when we disagree.

Most of us fall somewhere in between. But our communal organisations have historically tended towards the former, resulting in silence on many of the matters that affect not only Israel and the world’s view of Israel, but also our own community. The current election is a good example.

The previous coalition was an amazing experiment which was doomed to fail. But in its short life, it began the process of kickstarting the wheels of government, which had been moribund through four election cycles. It featured some firsts: no Charedi parties, an Israeli Arab party, and an incredible breadth of coalition partners from the left to the right. Despite its diametric make-up, it was able to put together a strong legislative agenda on domestic issues, but was not able to address more sensitive existential issues such as the Palestinian question. Not bad for a coalition whose only real defining purpose was to stop Benjamin Netanyahu from becoming prime minister.

As we approach next week’s election, once again personality dominates the campaign. And once again it is all about Bibi. The Likud – who would likely lead the next Knesset, like the Republicans and Trump – have allowed Netanyahu to retain sway over the party, denying Israel the political stability it craves. And the myth that only Bibi can lead Israel is one of the clear legacies of the last government.

Clearly, I am not a great fan of Netanyahu. While recognising his many past achievements, he is yesterday’s man – divisive, narcissistic, and potentially corrupt with an ambiguous motivation behind his quest for leadership. And I believe our community needs to not only prepare for the likelihood of a Netanyahu-led government, but needs to speak out at some of its policy declarations:

  1. The alliance between Bezalel Smotrich’s Religious Zionism Party and Itamar Ben Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power), brokered by Netanyahu to ensure maximum votes for the right. Both Smotrich and Ben Gvir hold extreme views. Ben Gvir presents as a particularly worrisome prospect. An acolyte of extremist Rabbi Meir Kahane, who advocated transferring Israel’s Arabs out of the country, Ben Gvir frequently stirs up friction between Jewish and Arab Israelis. He is associated with some of Israel’s most extremist Jewish movements and activists. But it has become clear that Netanyahu won’t be able to form a government without Ben Gvir taking a central role.
  2. Netanyahu has promised to reverse the previous government’s requirement for ultra-Orthodox institutions to teach core subjects like English and maths to get state funding. Done to shore up his election chances, the deal helped uphold the United Torah Judaism political alliance of the Degel HaTorah and Agudat Yisrael parties, without which one would not garner enough votes. The implications of the policy would be significant for both Charedim and the country. Gilad Malach, a researcher at the Israel Democracy Institute, states, “Charedi men’s underperformance in the market currently costs Israel some NIS 99 billion ($45 billion) each year in lost potential wages, and by 2050 this would go up to NIS 230 billion ($104 billion) per year.”
  3. The current government had sought to break the Charedi hegemony over religion in Israel. This included reform of the politicised process naming municipal rabbis; the inclusion of women in the management of services; reform of the conversion process; and the opening Israel’s kashrut certification regime to competition. These achievements will be under threat if the Charedi parties return to power. Many of these initiatives, including the stalled expanded egalitarian prayer site at the Western Wall, have become a flashpoint not only within Israel but also in the relationship with the Diaspora.
  4. Netanyahu and his party are seeking to limit the powers of key institutions that sought to hold them accountable in their last term. Their sights are on the Attorney-General’s position and the Supreme Court, which they perceive as a vehicle of the left. In addition, a pro-Netanyahu majority could theoretically pass legislation retroactively shielding Bibi, standing trial on a number of corruption charges, from any legal action until the end of his term. The entire system – the authority of the Supreme Court, the separation of powers between the government branches, the checks and balances – could all be at risk.

If Netanyahu remains the centre of attention, Israel will not be able to move on from the toxic political climate he has created. Should he come to power, and along with his political partners realise some of their stated policies, it will create a divisive and potentially poisonous political climate within Israel, deepen the rift with the Jewish Diaspora and threaten the world view of the country as a liberal democracy.

The issue is whether we should send a clear message to Israel if we believe that some of the decisions that are being made to suit the Israeli realpolitik will have repercussions not only for the citizens of Israel, but for the Jews in the Diaspora.

The current spate of antisemitism that is being experienced worldwide has a strong correlation to events in Israel. Much of contemporary anti-Zionism, or the delegitimisation of Israel and its supporters, draws on and perpetuates antisemitic tropes. Should a right-wing nationalist/religious coalition promoting divisive policies further damage the image of the state, it could result in a further deterioration to the safety of our community.

At the same time, we share the liberal democratic values of Israel. It is important to all of us that these are upheld, and Israel does not go down the path of Hungary, Turkey and even the United States. Our pride and connection are not just emotional – it is visceral, and our destinies are joined. We must play our part in ensuring that Israel, despite its challenges, remains a light among nations.

Danny Hochberg sits on a number of communal boards in the Sydney Jewish community.

read more:
comments