Rabbi gets payout in Mizrachi dispute

MIZRACHI SYNAGOGUE'S estranged rabbi, Moshe Gutnick, who took a dispute over his proposed sacking to the London Beth Din, has won an $800,000 payout after the court ruled he had the right to life tenure after 21 years of service.

CHANTAL ABITBOL

Rabbi Moshe Gutnick

SYDNEY Mizrachi’s estranged rabbi, Moshe Gutnick, who took a dispute over his proposed sacking to the London Beth Din, has won an $800,000 payout after the court ruled he had the right to life tenure after 21 years of service.

But there’s a caveat: the money cannot be paid to him at the expense of the cash-strapped shul having to sell its premises or downsize.

The London Beth Din handed down its ruling over the weekend — more than two months after both parties flew to London, along with their consul, to attend a three-day hearing on the matter in June.

It concluded that, despite the shul’s “initial reluctance” to grant life tenure and “the absence of a signed contract”, an agreement between the two parties had been reached entitling the rabbi to such an arrangement.

The court, however, noting it was “an unusual request for a young, part-time official”, concluded life tenure meant the rabbi was only entitled to be paid until the normal retirement age in Australia of 65 — not 80, as the rabbi had argued.

That translated to an annual salary of $80,000 for the next 15 years, or $1.2 million. Factoring in other mitigating circumstances, however, along with the shul’s current financial woes, the court reduced the sum to $800,000.

The court said Mizrachi must pay $200,000 up front when the rabbi officially leaves the congregation, with the balance paid in monthly installments of $4000 over 12 years starting March 2012.

The case first appeared before the NSW Supreme Court in April when the rabbi won a last-minute injunction blocking the shul from voting on a proposal to make his position redundant after 22 years of service.

The rabbi had argued that the board’s attempt to remove him went against his contractual life tenure, and only a Jewish court had the right to decide on whether to make his position redundant. The court ultimately ruled it was a matter for the Jewish courts.